SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 1469

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.C. Agrawal, S.P. Bharucha and B.N. Kirpal, JJ.
Union of India and others - Appellants
Versus
Permanand Singh - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 1333 of 1998.
Decided On : 21-7-1998

Reservation of 100% seats for women is not permissible under Article 16(4) of the Constitution, and Article 15(3) cannot be invoked to protect such reservation.

Headnote:

Reservation - Appointment on the post of Telephone Operator - The court held that 100% reservation of seats for women is not permissible under Article 16(4) of the Constitution and that Article 15(3) cannot be invoked to protect such reservation.

Fact of the Case:

The appeal related to the appointment on the post of Telephone Operator in the Patna Telephone Exchange, where all 40 posts were reserved for female candidates only. The advertisement and appointments based on it were challenged, and the Tribunal quashed the advertisement and appointments, citing the impermissibility of 100% reservation for women under the Constitution.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that since the Rules did not provide for reservation of posts for women, it was not permissible to reserve all the posts for women only. The decision of the Tribunal was affirmed, but the appointment of the female operators was not disturbed, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.

Issues: The issues revolved around the permissibility of 100% reservation of seats for women under the Constitution and the validity of the advertisement and appointments based on it.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in the absence of provision in the Rules, reservation of all posts for women was not permissible, and the decision of the Tribunal was affirmed. However, the appointments of the female operators were not disturbed.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the appointment of the female Telephone Operators made on the basis of the impugned advertisement was upheld without being upset.

ORDER :

S.C. Agrawal, J. - This appeal relates to appointment on the post of Telephone Operator in the Patna Telephone Exchange in pursuance of the advertisement that was published in the newspaper Searchlight dated 22-6-1982. As per the said advertisement, all the 40 posts of Telephone Operators in the said Exchange were reserved for female candidates only. The said advertisement was challenged by the respondent by filing a writ petition before the Patna High Court. The said writ petition was transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal"). By the impugned judgment dated 19-5-1997, the Tribunal has allowed the said application and has quashed the advertisement as well as the appointments made on the basis of the said advertisement on the ground that 100% reservation of seats for women is not permissible under Article 16(4) of the Constitution and that Article 15(3) cannot be invoked to protect such reservation.

2. At the relevant time, recruitment to the post of Telephone Operator was governed by the Posts and Telegraphs (Telephone Operators) Recruitment Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"). The said Rules did not contain any provision providing for reservation of any posts for women. Shri P.P. Malhotra, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants, submits that in view of clause (3) of Article 15 of the Constitution, it was permissible for the administration to reserve all the posts of Telephone Operators in a particular exchange for women. Shri Malhotra has stated that in Bihar Telephone District there were 1399 male Telephone Operators and 270 female Telephone Operators and that the ratio of female operators was about 9.2 per cent only. Shri Malhotra has submitted that by virtue of Article 15(3) of the Constitution, it was permissible for the administration to reserve all the posts in the Patna Telephone Exchange for female operators.

3. In the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has pointed out that in the absence of any provision in that regard in the Rules, clause (3) of Article 15 of the Constitution, by itself, would not enable the administration to reserve all the posts in a particular telephone exchange for women. The Tribunal has also placed reliance on the judgment of the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Applications Nos. 2333 and 458 of 1979 wherein a similar reservation of all posts in a telephone exchange for women was struck down. Shri Malhotra has not been able to point out that the said judgment of the Gujarat High Court has been assailed by the Union of India before this Court.

4. We have carefully considered the submissions of Shri Malhotra but we are unable to accept the same. Since the Rules do not make any provision for reservation of posts for women in the matter of appointment on the posts of Telephone Operators, it was not permissible for the appellants to reserve the posts of Telephone Operators in the Patna Telephone Exchange for women only. The decision of this Court in Govt. of A.P. v. P.B. Vijayakumar, (1995) 4 SCC 520 , on which reliance has been placed by Shri Malhotra has no application to the present case. In that case, this Court was dealing with the A.P. State and Subordinate Service Rules wherein it was provided that in the matter of direct recruitment to a post for which women and men are equally suited, other things being equal, preference be given to women for filling the posts limited to the extent of 30% in each category of OC, BC, SC and ST quota. The said provision was upheld as valid by this Court in view of clause (3) of Article 15 of the Constitution. There is no provision similar to that provision in the Rules. The decision in the case of P.B. Vijayakumar does not, therefore, lend any assistance to the submission of Shri Malhotra.

5. The impugned judgment of the Tribunal holding that reservation of 100% posts for women for appointment on the posts of Telephone Operators in the Patna Telephon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top