SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1603

S.P.BHARUCHA, V.N.KHARE, D.P.MOHAPATRA
State of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Kesoram Industries Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER :

Great emphasis has been placed by learned counsel for the State of West Bengal upon the judgment of a Bench of three learned Judges in Goodricke Group Ltd. v. State of W.B., 1995 Supp (1) SCC 707 Quite apart from the fact that there are pending proceedings in this Court seeking to reconcile the judgment in Goodricke with that in State of Orissa v. Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., 1995 Supp (2) SCC 686 we find some difficulty in accepting as correct the view taken by Goodricke particularly having regard to the earlier decision (of a Bench of two learned Judges) in Buxa Dooars Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of W.B., (1989) 3 SCC 211 . We think, therefore, that these matters should be heard by a Constitution Bench.

2. The papers and proceedings may, accordingly, be placed before the Honble the Chief Justice for appropriate directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top