SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1862

S.H.KAPADIA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Commnr. of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Gas Authority of India Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER :

1. The short question which arises for determination in these civil appeals filed by the Department under section 35L of Central Excise Act, 1944 is: Whether Lean Gas produced by Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) is a manufactured marketable final product or by-product?

2. On April 1, 1999, show cause notice was issued to the assessee by the Superintendent, Central Excise, in which it was alleged by the Department that the fnoticee (assessee) had cleared Lean Gas in bulk to M/s. Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Limited (IPCL), M/s. Vikram Ispat Ltd., and M/s. Ispat Industries as Natural Gas under Chapter Heading 2611.21 claiming nil rate of duty. In the said show cause notice, however, the allegation was based on the footing that Lean Gas was a by-product after due manufacturing process stood carried out on Natural Gas to extract LPG. We quote hereinbelow the relevant portion from the show cause notice, which reads as under:

    "However it is found that Lean Gas is a by-product after due manufacturing process on Natural gas to extract L.P.G. Hence Lean gas is a result of a manufacturing process and therefore attract provisions of rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top