SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1755

B.P.SINGH, H.S.BEDI
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Mar Appraem Kuri Company Limited – Respondent


ORDER :

1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties for some time.

2. In the instant case, we are concerned with an amendment introduced by the Kerala Legislature by the Kerala Finance Act, 2002 incorporating in the Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 (Kerala Act 23 of 1975), Section 4(l)(a) which is as follows:

    "4. (1)(a) Where a chitties is registered outside the State and twenty percent or more of the subscribers are persons normally residing in the State, the foreman of the chitty shall open a branch in the State and obtain sanction and registration under the provisions of this Act."

3. The said amendment was challenged by the respondents herein and one of the grounds urged on their behalf was that the provisions of the Kerala Act were inconsistent with the provisions of a Central Act enacted by Parliament, namely, the Chit Funds Act, 1982. It is admitted before us that under Section 1(3) of the said Act, the Act shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint, and different dates may be appointed for different States. It is also not disputed before us that the notification under Section 1(3) of the Act has not be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top