SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 2166

ASHOK BHAN, DALVEER BHANDARI
Cipla Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore – Respondent


ORDER :

1. This is a statutory appeal filed by the assessee under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short ‘the Act’) against the final Order No. 698 of 2002 dated 31st May 2002 in Appeal No. E/906/99 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Bangalore (for short ‘the Tribunal’). By this order the Tribunal has rejected the appeal filed by the appellant and has held that Benzyl Methyl Salicylate (for short ‘BMS’) is marketable and therefore liable to excise duty.

2. The appellant-company is engaged in the manufacture of patent and proprietary medicines and organic chemicals (bulk drugs and intermediate) falling under Chapters 29 and 30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (for short ‘Tariff Act’) in their factory at Virgonagar, Old Madras Road, Bangalore. Appellant filed classification lists with effect from 5.6.1986 and 1.3.1987 in which they declared that one of the items, viz. BMS prepared in their factory was a non-excisable item.

3. The Revenue issued two separate show cause notices both dated 25th August 1987 wherein it was proposed that BMS was an item liable to duty under sub-heading 2913.00 of the Tariff Act pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top