SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1996

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J.M.PANCHAL
Manoramabai – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Council, Saoner – Respondent


ORDER :

Panchal J.M., J.

Delay condoned. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The first respondent Municipal Council, filed a suit for ejectment against three defendants (Shamrao, Dayaram and second respondent). The trial Court decreed the suit. The first defendant filed an appeal and during the pendency of the appeal he died and his seven LRs were brought on record. The first Appellate Court rejected the appeal on 20.2.1993. Aggrieved by the rejection, the LRs of the first defendant filed a second appeal (SA No.92/1993) before the High Court of Bombay. The second appeal was admitted and was pending for more than a decade. No dates of hearing were being given. One of the LRs of the first defendant, namely appellant No.3 before the High Court (Dadasao Shamrao Saoji), died in the year 1996. An application for setting aside the abatement with an application for condonation of delay and an application for bringing LRs of the deceased third appellant were filed in the year 2003. The High Court rejected the applications on 27.7.2005 as it was not satisfied with the reasons assigned for condoning the delay.

3. Thereafter, the plaintiff (first respondent) filed an applicati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top