SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1964

ALTAMAS KABIR, MARKANDEY KATJU
Maqsood Yusuf Merchant – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


ORDER :

Altamas Kabir, J.

Leave granted. On 28-12-2001, the applicant was arrested by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence at Mumbai on the allegation that he, along with one Yusuf Dhanani, had fraudulently prepared bills of lading and cheated the Revenue of a huge amount.

2. On 2-1-2002, the appellant was admitted to bail by the High Court. On 22-2-2002, Yusuf Dhanani was arrested and thereafter detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as "COFEPOSA"). The order of bail granted to the appellant was challenged in this Court by the State but such challenge was rejected. In between, on 19-3-2002 an order of detention was also passed against the appellant under the aforesaid provisions of the COFEPOSA Act.

3. It appears that the order of detention could not be executed against the appellant and in July 2006, the appellant challenged the same before the Delhi High Court and while the matter was pending, the appellant and the other detenu approached the Settlement Commission appointed under the Customs Act, 1962 on 13-7-2007 and, ultimately, the matter was settled by an order passed by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top