SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 2052

C.K.THAKKER, D.K.JAIN
Malik Mazhar Sultan – Appellant
Versus
U. P. Public Service Commission – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Senior Advocate (A.C.), Ms. Sneha and Mr. Ezaj Maqbool, Advocates.
For the Applicant :Ms. Soumya Chakraborty and Mr. DB Vohra, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh, Mr. Atul Jha and Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Advocates.
For the Intervenor :Mr. Arvind Kr. Tiwary and Mr. Rannjan Dwivedi, Advocates.
For the High Court of Patna :Mr. Pravin H. Parekh, Senior Advocate, Mr. Ajay Kr. Jha, Ms. Mary Mitry, Ms. Divya Sinha, for M/s P.H. Parekh & Co., Mr. K.K. Mohan and Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Advocates.
For the M.P. High Court :Mr. C.D. Singh, Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Mr. Vairagya Vardhan, Mr. Aditya Singh and Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, Advocates.
For the Allahabad High Court :Mr. Ashok K. Srivastava, Mr. Saurabh Trivedi, Mr. Indrajeet Das and Mr. Debasis Misra, Advocates.
For the UOI :Mr. Navin Prakash, Ms. Rekha Pandey and Ms. Sushma Suri, Advocates.
For the High Court of A.P. :Mr. T.V. Ratnam, Advocate.
For the Orissa High Court :Mr. Janaranjan Das and Mr. Swetaketu Mishra, Advocates.
For the Maharashtra :Mr. Sanjay V. Kharde and Ms. Asha G. Nair, Advocates.
For the Bombay High Court :Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Choudhary, Mr. Sanjay Visen and Ms. Rucha A Mayee, Advocates.
For the Bihar :Mr. Gopal Singh, Mr. Manish Kumar and Ms. Vimla Sinha, Advocates.
For the Tripura :Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate.
For the West Bengal :Mr. Bhaskar Gupta, Senior Advocate, Ms. Tara Chandra Sharma and Ms. Neelam Sharma, Advocates.
For the Arunachal Pradesh :Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Advocate.
For the U.P. :Mr. S.R. Singh Yadav, Senior Advocate, Mr. Yunus Malik, Mr. Shrish Kumar Mishra, Ms. Pushkin, Ms. Sunita Gautam, Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Mr. G.V. Rao, Mr. P.I. Jose, Mr. Vivek Kandari, Mr. Pradeep Misra, Mr. Radha Shyam Jena and Mr. Ashok Mathur, Advocates.
For the Uttarakhand :Mr. L.P. Nathani, Advocate General, Mr. Anuvrat Sharma and Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Advocates.
For the Karnataka :Mr. Sanjay R Hegde, Mr. A Rohen Singh and Mr. Amit Kr. Chawla, Advocates.
For the Manipur :Mr. K.H. Nobin Singh, Advocate.
For the Delhi High Court :Ms. Jyoti Singh, Mr. A Mariarputham and Mrs. Aruna Mathur, Advocates for M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.
For the Tamil Nadu :Mr. A Mariarputham and Ms. Aruna Mathur, Advocates for M/s Arputham Aruna & Co..
For the Sikkim and Sikkim High Court :Mr. Sonam P Wandi, Advocate General of Sikkim, Mr. A Mariarputham, Ms. Aruna Mathur, Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Advocates for M/s. Arputham Aruna and Co..
For the M.P. :Mr. Vikas Upadhyay and Mr. B.S. Banthia, Advocates.
For the Chhattisgarh :Mr. Atul Jha, Mr. D.K. Sinha, Ms. Suparna Srivastava, Mr. Neeraj Srivastava and Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Advocates.
For the Rajasthan :Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Mr. B.N. Jha, Mr. Sunil Kr. Jain and Mr. Aneesh Mittal, Advocates.
For the Nagaland :Mr. K.N. Balgopal, Advocate General, Mr. Ritu Raj Biswas, Mr. S Balaji and Mr. A.P. Mukundan, Advocates.
For the Haryana :Mr. Manjit Singh, Addl. Advocate General, Mr. T.V. George, Advocate.
For the Goa :Ms. A Subhashini, Advocate.
For the Mizoram :Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan and Mr. R Sathish, Advocates.
For the U.T. (Pondicherry) :Mr. T.L.V. Iyer, Sr. Advocate , Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Mr. S.J. Aristotle and Mr. Prabu Rama Subramanian, Advocates.
For the High Court of Tamil Nadu :Mr. R. Nadumaran, Advocate.
For the Calcutta High Court :Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Senior Advocate, Mr. G.S. Chatterjee, Mr. Raja Chatterjee and Mr. Sachin Das, Advocates.
For the Chandigarh High Court :Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Mr. Tarun Gupta and Ms. S Janani, Advocates.
For the Patna High Court :Mr. P.H. Pareksh, Sr. Advocate , Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Ms. Divya Sinha, Advocates, for M/s P.H. Parekh & Co..
For the NCT Delhi :Mr. Wasim A Qadri, Ms. Sunit Sharma, Ms. Asha G Nair, Mr. D.S. Mahra, Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Mr. Saurav Datta, Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Mr. Binay Kumar Panta, Mr. Subhasish Howmick, Mr. S.C. Patel, Ms. S. Janani and Mr. Deepak Goel, Advocates.
For the Assam :Mr. Amrit Phukan, Advocate Gen., Mr. Ng.J.R. Luwang and Ms. Riku Sarma, Advcoates, for M/s Corporate Law Group.
For the Kerala :Mr. G Prakash, Advocate.
For the Punjab :Mrs. Jay Shree Anand, Addl. Advocate General, Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Mr. Ajay Pal, Mr. Kuldip Singh (NP), Mr. Arun K Sinha (NP), Advocates.
For the State of HP :Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the UPPSC :Ms. Binu Tamta and Mr. T Mahipal, Advocates.
For the Chhattisgarh :Mr. Atul Jha and Mr. D.K. Sinha, Advocates.
For the Jharkhand Ms. Suparna Srivastava and Mr. Rajesh Patnaik, Advocates.
For the Meghalaya :Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee and Mr. S.C. Gosh, Advocates.
For the J & K :Mr. Anis Suharawardy, Mr. S Mehdi Imam, Mr. Tabraz Ahmed, Ms. Samridhi, for Gujarat Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Mr. Somnath and Ms. K Enatahi Sema, Advocates.
For the Uttarakhand :Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Mr. Noorullaha, Mr. Y Rajagopala Rao, Mr. Y Ramesh, Mr. Y Vismai, Mrs. D Bharathi Reddy, Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta and Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Advocates.
For the Punjab & Haryana High Court :Ms. Asha Jain Madan and Mr. Mukesh Jain, Advocates.
For the U.P.P.S.C. :Mr. Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Ms. Vandana Mishra, Ms. Vibha Dwivedi, Mr. Sidhartha Choudhary and Mr. C. Balaji, Advocates.

ORDER :

State of Bihar/High Court of Patna

1. Earlier I.A. No. 33 filed by the State of Bihar was disposed of. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. It appears that controversy between the High Court of Patna and the State of Bihar still continues even after earlier order was passed by this Court. The resultant effect is that at the lowest run, i.e., in the cadre of Civil Judge (Jr. Division), in the year 2008, there are as many as 84 vacancies and so far these have not been even advertised. It is pointed out that the High Court had framed the rules and had sent these to the State Government but the State Government was insisting for amendment of rules providing for reservation for the OBCs. In our opinion, it would be appropriate if the process of recruitment is undertaken immediately by both, namely, the State of Bihar as well as High Court of Patna as per the existing Rules. Similarly, there are 25% vacancies in the cadre of District Judge by direct recruitment. 09 vacancies have not been filled up because of the aforesaid reasons. In our opinion, it would be appropriate, if a direction is issued to all concerned to undertake the process of recruitment as per the existi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top