SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 2014

S.H.KAPADIA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Dy. Commr. of Income-tax, Ahmedabad – Appellant
Versus
N. K. Industries Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Leave granted.

2. This Civil Appeal is filed by the Department against the judgment and Order dated 17th October, 2005 passed by the Gujarat High Court in Tax Appeals Nos. 240/2003 and 261/2003.

3. We are concerned with the block period 1-4-1988 to 24-2-1999. The main contention advanced on behalf of the Department is that for allowance of deduction for depreciation, the asset must not only be owned by the assessee but it must also be used for the purposes of business or profession of the assessee. It is the case of the Department that the word "used" in Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 refers to actual use of the asset. It is the case of the Department that having regard to the scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and, particularly, after the introduction of the concept of "block of assets", actual use is the only requirement apart from ownership for allowance of depreciation under Section 32. It is the case of the Department that important question of law arose for determination before the High Court. That, the High Court has failed to examine the said question and that it had erred in dismissing the Tax Appeals only on the ground that no substantial question of law h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top