SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 702

O.CHINNAPPA REDDY, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH
People's Union for Civil Liberties – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Special leave granted.

2. The Medical Officer, Government hospital, Proddatur sent information to the First Class Magistrate, Proddatur that one K. Subbarayudu who had been sent to the hospital from the police lock-up with serious injuries, had died in the hospital. Thereupon, the learned Magistrate instead of straightway taking cognizance of the offence under section 190 (1)(c) of code of Criminal Procedure issued summons to the Sub-Inspector of Police and others for the purpose of holding an enquiry in order to determine whether cognizance should be taken or not. After the proceeding was kept pending for some time, the Sub-Inspector of Police moved the High Court to quash the proceeding on the ground that the Magistrate did not have the jurisdiction to hold any enquiry for the purpose of taking cognizance under section 190 (1)(c). The High Court accepted the contention of the police officer and quashed proceeding pending before the Magistrate. While we do not doubt that the Magistrate who receives information about the commission of an offence has no jurisdiction to hold a preliminary enquiry, as it were, for the purpose of taking cognizance under section 190(1)(c), we d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top