SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 1023

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.S. Verma, K. Jayachandra Reddy, S.C. Agrawal, G.N. Ray, R.C. Pattanaik, JJ.
Kihoto Hollohon Vizol - Petitioner
Versus
Zachilhu & Ors. - Respondents
Contempt Petition No. 359 of 91
Decided On : 17-01-1992

The court has the discretion to grant adjournments based on the request of the counsel.

Headnote:

Adjourned - Contempt of Court - The court adjourned the matter to a later date at the request of the counsel.

Fact of the Case:

The counsel requested an adjournment to a later date.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted the adjournment and scheduled the matter for a later date.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi:

Final Decision: The court adjourned the matter to a later date as per the counsel's request.

JUDGMENT :

S.L.P. Nos. 18928 & 18929-38 of 1991:

1. Adjourned to 28th January, 1992 at the common request of the counsel.

Contempt Petition No. 359/91:-

2. Mr. S.K. Bhattacharya appears on behalf of the Speaker Dr. H. Borababu Singh and states that he would be filing vakalatnama by the coming Monday the 20th Jan. 1992 and the reply of the Speaker on or before 27th January, 1992. It would be appropriate that this matter to be listed for hearing before the same constitution Bench which passed the order of which disobedience is alleged. The matter be listed before the appropriate Bench on 31st January, 1992.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top