SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1623

DORAISWAMY RAJU, H.K.SEMA
Vithal – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Doraiswamy Raju, J.

The above appeal has been filed against the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench dated 2-5-2001 in Criminal Appeal No. 33 of 1996 where under the appellant's conviction for offences punishable under Sections 302, 498-A and 201 of the Penal Code, 1860 (for short "Indian Penal Code") with sentence of life imprisonment and fine, with two years' rigorous imprisonment with fine and another two years' rigorous imprisonment for the respective offences noticed (supra) came to be affirmed. Before the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 283 of 1994 the appellant, his father, his brother, his sister, his sister's son and sister's husband were arrayed as accused to face the trial for offences punishable under Sections 302, 498-A and Section 201 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code. After trial and on consideration of the evidence on record the learned Sessions Judge came to the conclusion that the offences under Sections 498-A, 302 and 201 Indian Penal Code have been sufficiently substantiated and proved against Accused 1 (the sole appellant herein) of having committed the murder of his wife and

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top