SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 2593

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.S. Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, JJ.
In Re: Misreporting of Court Proceedings in the matter of National Green Tribunal by the Newspapers the Indian Express and the Pioneer on 20.09.2012. - Petitioner
Versus
XYZ - Respondent
Suo Moto Compt. Pet. No. 343 of 2012
Decided On : 30-10-2012

Important Points

Unqualified apologies led to the deferral of consideration by the court.

Subject

Civil Law - Apology and Deferral

Headnote

Apology - Deferral of Consideration - Unqualified Apologies

Fact of the Case:

The court was informed that affidavits with unqualified apologies from the correspondent and publishers of Indian Express and Pioneer will be filed.

Finding of the Court:

The court deemed it proper to defer consideration of the matter until the next Tuesday.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi:

Final Decision: The matter was listed for consideration on 06.11.2012.

JUDGMENT :

1. Shri Nariman informed that both Shri Utkarsh Anand and the publisher of the Indian Express are present in the Court. Shri Sorabjee informed that the publisher of the Pioneer is also present in the Court.

2. Shri Nariman says that affidavits on behalf of the correspondent and the publisher will be filed during the course of the day. Shri Sorabjee referred to the reply filed on behalf of the publisher of the Pioneer and pointed out that he has tendered unqualified apology.

3. Shri Nariman says that in the affidavits to be filed by Shri Utkarsh Anand and the publisher of Indian Express also unqualified apologies are being tendered.

4. In view of the statement made by Shri Nariman, we deem it proper to defer consideration of this matter till next Tuesday.

5. List the matter on 06.11.2012.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top