SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1688

RUMA PAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Foramer France (Through Constituted Attorneys) – Respondent


ORDER :

Ruma Pal, J. - We have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the facts of the case. We see no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. Accordingly, the civil appeals are dismissed with costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top