Back
Next 
2003 Supreme(SC) 1688
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ruma Pal, B.N. Srikrishna, JJ.
Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Anr. - Appellant
Versus
Foramer France (Through Constituted Attorneys) - Respondent
Appeal Civil 5269 -5271 Of 2001
Decided On : 16-1-2003
Important Points
The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision and dismissed the appeals, finding no grounds to interfere with the lower court's judgment.
Subject
Taxation - Income Tax
Headnote
(A) Taxation - Appeal from High Court - Interference with lower court order - Dismissal of appeals - No reason found to interfere with the decision of the High Court.
Facts of the case:
Appeals were filed by the tax authorities challenging the decision of the High Court.
Findings of Court:
The court, after hearing the parties and considering the facts, found no reason to interfere with the decision rendered by the High Court.
Issues: Whether there were sufficient grounds to interfere with the decision of the High Court.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the facts and the decision of the High Court do not warrant interference, the appellate court shall uphold the lower court's decision.
Result: Civil appeals dismissed with costs.
Facts of the case:
Appeals were filed by the tax authorities challenging the decision of the High Court.
Findings of Court:
The court, after hearing the parties and considering the facts, found no reason to interfere with the decision rendered by the High Court.
Issues: Whether there were sufficient grounds to interfere with the decision of the High Court.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the facts and the decision of the High Court do not warrant interference, the appellate court shall uphold the lower court's decision.
Result: Civil appeals dismissed with costs.
Legal Category Hierarchy
-
practice and procedure
- appeals
ORDER :
Ruma Pal, J. - We have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the facts of the case. We see no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. Accordingly, the civil appeals are dismissed with costs.
