SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1610

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. Rajendra Babu, G.P. Mathur, JJ.
Collector Of Central Excise, New Delhi - Appellant
Versus
Bhagsons Paint Industry (India) - Respondent
Appeal Civil 5774 of 1997
Decided On : 16-10-2003

Adjudication after a lapse of time is permissible and pertains only to the actual levy of duty due to the department, not to any levy of interest or penalty.

Headnote:

Central Excise Act - Adjudication after Lapse of Time - The court held that adjudication after a lapse of nearly nine years after the issue of show cause notice is permissible and set aside the Tribunal's decision. The adjudication pertains only to the actual levy of the duty due to the department and not to any levy of interest or penalty.

Fact of the Case:

The Tribunal held that adjudication after a lapse of nearly nine years after the issue of show cause notice is not permissible and set aside the same.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there is no statutory bar to adjudicate the matter even after a lapse of nine years after the issue of show cause notice. The court set aside the Tribunal's decision and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with the law.

Issues: Adjudication after a lapse of time, statutory bar, actual levy of duty

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that adjudication after a lapse of time is permissible and pertains only to the actual levy of the duty due to the department, not to any levy of interest or penalty.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the court set aside the Tribunal's decision, remitting the matter to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with the law.

ORDER :

1. The Tribunal in an appeal arising under the Central Excise Act held that the adjudication made after a lapse of nearly nine years after the issue of show cause notice is not permissible and set aside the same.

2. There is no statutory bar to adjudicate the matter even after lapse of nine years after the issue of show cause notice and the adjudication pertains only to the actual levy of the duty which is due to the department and not to any levy of interest or penalty. In these circumstances we think the view taken by the Tribunal is not justified and we set aside the order made by the Tribunal and remit the matter to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with law after restoration of the appeal to its original number. The appeal is allowed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top