SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. B. Shah, Arun Kumar, JJ.
Fortune Impex - Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner of Customs - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6982 of 2001.
Decided On : 30-4-2003
Penalty - Customs Act, 1962 - Imposition of penalty on exporting and supplying company - Directors/Partners of both companies same
Fact of the Case:
The appellants appealed against the confirmation of a penalty of Rs. four lakhs for attempting to export goods and upheld allegations in the show cause notice.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned order did not call for interference and declined to entertain a new contention regarding the penalty imposed on both the exporting and supplying companies.
Issues: Violation of Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 due to penalty imposition on both exporting and supplying companies.
Ratio Decidendi: The court declined to entertain a new contention regarding the penalty and noted that the Directors/Partners of both the exporting and supplying companies were the same.
Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.
ORDER :
1. These appeals arise out of the common judgment and order dated 3rd July, 2001 passed by the Central Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Eastern Bench Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") in Appeal No. C/RV-21/98 etc. whereby the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants and confirmed a penalty of Rs. four lakhs and upheld the allegations contained in the show cause notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Air Cargo Complex (Exports), Kolkata. Aggrieved by the same, the appellants have filed the aforesaid appeals. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in our view, the impugned order passed by the Tribunal does not call for interference. However, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the penalty imposed by the Authority is in violation of Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 because it is imposed both on the appellant-Company which attempted to export the goods as well as on the Company which had supplied the same. As no such contention was raised before the Tribunal, in our view, this contention is not required to be entertained at this stage in these appeals. We, however, note that it is the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent that Directors/Partners of both the companies, namely, which attempted to export and which supplied the goods are same.
3. In the result, the appeals are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.