SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1389

A.K.PATNAIK, S.S.NIJJAR, RANJAN GOGOI
T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


ORDER :

Item No. 301

IAs Nos. 1868, 2091, 2225-2227, 2380, 2568 and 2937 in WP(C) No. 202 of 1995 (Lafarge Matter) regarding implementation of the directions of the Hon'ble Court as contained in Para-II guidelines to be followed in future cases of judgment dated 6.7.2011. Lafarge Umiam Mining Private Limited v. Union of India, (2011) 7 SCC 338)

1. We have heard Mr. Harish N. Salve,the learned Amicus Curiae. He submitted that as per the directions of this Court in , the Regulator should have been put in place under Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Mr. Mohan Parasaran, the learned Solicitor General, prayed for four weeks time to obtain instructions and apprise this Court as to when the direction of this Court will be complied with.

2. List these applications on 21st October, 2013.

Item No. 303

IAs Nos. 1991 of 2007 and IA No. 3117 in IA No. 1991 in WP(C) No. 202 Of 1995 (for directions and setting aside the report dated 18.09.2008 of the Central Empowered Committee)10

3. List These Applications On 30th September, 2013. Counsel for the State of Himachal Pradesh will file an affidavit one week before 30th September, 2013.

Item No. 305

IAs Nos. 3458-3460 in WP(C) No. 202 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top