ORDER :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant/petitioner herein to recall the order passed by this Court dated 03.09.2020 passed in Transferred Case (Criminal) No. 1 of 2020.

2. We have heard the applicant-petitioner in person at length. When we pointed out to the applicant-petitioner in person that as earlier another application filed by her for the very same relief as in the present application was dismissed by this Court, the second application for the same relief could not be maintainable, the applicant-petitioner in person submitted that one of us (Dr. Dhananjaya Y.Chandrachud, J.) should recuse himself from hearing the present application. We see no valid and good ground for recusal by one of us. Merely because the order might not be in favour of the applicant earlier, cannot be a ground for recusal. A litigant cannot be permitted to browbeat the Court by seeking a Bench of its choice. Therefore, the prayer of the applicant-petitioner in person that one of us (Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.) should recuse from hearing the present miscellaneous application is not accepted and the said prayer is rejected.

3. Now so far as the present applica