SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 129

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari, Hrishikesh Roy, JJ.
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. – APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
K. SHOBANA ETC. ETC. – RESPONDENT(S)
Civil Appeal Nos. 3745-3754 of 2020
Decided on : 05-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Balaji Srinivasan, Vinodh Kanna B., Arindam Ghosh, Advocates
For the Respondent:N.L. Rajah, V. Mohana, K. Balu, Advocate, M.R. Jothimanian, B. Karunakaran, S. Gowthaman, Promila, Advocate, S. Thananjayan, M.P. Parthiban, K. Jagdishvaran, G. Indira, Vikas Mehta, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINTS
(1) Reservation in appointment – Such of reservation category candidates who make it on their own merit have to be adjusted against general category candidates.
(2) If a word is used in a Statue, it cannot be made otiose.

Headnote:

Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 - Section 27(f) - Employment and Service matter - Applications - Post of Post Graduate Assistants - Direct recruitment - Appellant No. 3, inviting applications online from eligible candidates for direct recruitment to post of Post Graduate Assistants and Physical Education Directors, Grade-I in school education and other departments for year in Tamil Nadu - Recruitment for various subjects was carried out smoothly, but filling up of vacancies for post of Post Graduate Assistants in Chemistry has caused some disputes in which respondents were applicants - In terms of notification, a total of 356 posts were notified for Chemistry, out of which 117 vacancies were available for Most Backward Class (MBC) and Denotified Community (DNC) candidates - Break-up of 117 vacancies was of 74 backlog vacancies and 43 current vacancies - Whether required number of candidates who are otherwise entitled to be appointed under horizontal reservation have been selected under vertical reservation – Held, It appears that such a situation may not arise in future as all backlog vacancies are stated to have been filled in - Performance and merit of candidates, as apparent from list in question, would itself show as to how many candidates have been successful to attain appointment on a merit position without even availing of reservation- an extremely encouraging aspect - Increase in MBC/DNC candidates really does not impinge on reservation of seats for other categories, nor does it violate any provision of Constitution of India - 10[These observations are in context of controversy before Court as larger issue of reservation beyond 50%, qua Tamil Nadu, is still pending consideration before this Court.] Though, of course, it would imply that some of other candidates from different reserved categories would not be entitled to fill in reserved seats of MBC/DNC categories, if those seats would have remained vacant - Appeals are dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.

The perennial problem of working out the reservation system given the scarce employment sources has given rise to the present dispute.

2. Notification was issued on 12.06.2019 by the Teachers' Recruitment Board, appellant No. 3, inviting applications online from eligible candidates for direct recruitment to the post of Post Graduate Assistants and Physical Education Directors, Grade-I in school education and other departments for the year 2018-2019 in Tamil Nadu. The recruitment for various subjects was carried out smoothly, but the filling up of vacancies for the post of Post Graduate Assistants in Chemistry has caused some disputes in which the respondents were applicants. In terms of the notification, a total of 356 posts were notified for Chemistry, out of which 117 vacancies were available for Most Backward Class (MBC) and Denotified Community (DNC) candidates. The break-up of 117 vacancies was of 74 backlog vacancies and 43 current vacancies.

3. The respondents, among other candidates, applied for the aforementioned post online and appeared in the written examination on 28.09.2019. Post verification of certificates, a provisional selection list was published by appellant No. 3 on 20.11.2019, but the names of the respondents were absent.

4. The respondents claimed that on scrutinizing the list, they found that the meritorious candidates under the MBC quota, who would have been selected irrespective of any reservation, had not been considered under the general vacancies but had been appointed in the MBC/DNC quota against the backlog vacancies. This had caused the respondents not to be appointed. It was their submission that the meritorious candidates were required to be adjusted against vacancies on merit in the General Turn, and it is only thereafter that the backlog vacancies had to be filled in and thereafter, lastly, the current vacancies under the quota had to be adjusted.

5. The aforesaid resulted in filing of writ petitions before the High Court of Madras seeking quashing of the provisional selection list and for appointment of these respondents.

6. The controversy really arose and arises from the interpretation of Section 27(f) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The relevant Section reads as under:

    "27. Reservation for Appointments-

    (f) If qualified and suitable candidates belonging to any of the Backward Classes, Backward Class Muslims including the Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities are not available for selection for appointment by recruitment by transfer or by promotion in the turns allotted to them, the turns so allotted shall lapse and the selection for appointment for the vacancies shall be made by the next turn in the order of rotation:

    Provided also that in the case of selection for appointment by direct recruitment, with effect on and from the 1st April 1989, there shall be a ban on dereservation of vacancies reserved for the candidates belonging to any of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities to be appointed by direct recruitment. But, the above ban on dereservation of vacancies shall not be applicable to the vacancies reserved for the Backward Classes (other than Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities), Backward Class Muslims and, therefore, if qualified and suitable candidates belonging to any of the Backward Classes (other than Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities), Backward Class Muslims are not available for appointment, the turn so allotted to them shall lapse and the vacancy shall be filled by the next turn in the order of rotation. If sufficient number of qualified and suitable candidates belonging to any of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities are not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top