SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 137

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra, Krishna Murari, JJ.
Hampshire Hotels And Resorts (Noida) Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
Ritu Maheshwari, Chief Executive Officer, New Okhla Industrial Development Authority
(Noida) - Contemnor
Contempt Petition (Civil) No.413 Of 2019 In Civil Appeal No.4564 Of 2008 With Contempt Petition (Civil) No.416 Of 2019 In Civil Appeal No.4570 Of 2008 With Contempt Petition (Civil) No.415 Of 2019 In Civil Appeal No.4568 Of 2008 With Contempt Petition (Civil) No.414 Of 2019 In Civil Appeal No.4566 Of 2008 With Contempt Petition (Civil) No.645 Of 2019 In Civil Appeal No.4565 Of 2008 With Contempt Petition (Civil) No.646 Of 2019 In Civil Appeal No.4571 Of 2008 With Contempt Petition (Civil) No.647 Of 2019 In Civil Appeal No.4569 Of 2008
Decided On : 09-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Gaurav Puri, Aayush Agarwala, Saarthak Gupta, Pramod B. Agarwala, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Ravindra Kumar, Advocate

Headnote:

Land premium/instalments - Lease deed - At 135th meeting of Board of Directors/Members of NOIDA Authority (for short ‘NOIDA Board’) held said State Policy dated to attract more capital investment in tourism/hotel industry was considered - NOIDA Board resolved to implement said policy in areas falling within its jurisdiction and apply rates applicable to its Industrial area (Phase I) to plots to be allotted to hotel industry - Rate referred was reserve rate of Rs.7400/- per sq.m. applicable to Industrial Area (Phase I) plots, fixed by NOIDA Board at its meeting held - Resolution also mentioned that implementation of said policy should ensure construction of sufficient hotels before Commonwealth Games to be held in Delhi, which were scheduled to commence - Having regard to the importance of matter, Principal Secretary, Tourism, Commissioner, Meerut Circle and Director of Industries of U.P. Government, attended said meeting as special invitees - Whether such interest amount is also liable to refunded and that too with interest – Held, It is made clear that handing over of possession in exercise of revised Second Option, as granted earlier or taking over of possession in terms of the preceding paragraph, shall be on “as is where is” basis - Concerned Petitioners shall not be entitled to any value addition, be it in form of construction of any structures or erection of any compound wall - scope of the Contempt Petitions was restricted to see whether functionaries of NOIDA were guilty of disobedience of directions issued by this Court, matter was considered from standpoint of enabling both sides to settle their disputes and get over stalemate which has been obtaining for last 10 years - Endeavour was to see that interest of both sides is sufficiently taken care of and more than anything else, public interest must stand subserved - It is with this solution in mind, that directions as stated above have been issued by this Court - Contempt Petitions are rejected and Contempt Petitions are closed - Ordered accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

Uday Umesh Lalit, J.

1. These Contempt Petitions allege infraction on part of NOIDA, the Respondent-Authority in not obeying the directions issued by this Court in its Judgment and Order dated 05.07.2011 in Civil Appeal No.4564 of 2008, (2011) 7 SCC 493 (ITC Ltd. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.) and all other connected matters; and seek issuance of directions to NOIDA to execute a fresh lease deed/supplementary lease deed as detailed in the aforesaid Judgment and Order dated 05.07.2011 and for rescheduling of the balance land premium/instalments.

2. The basic facts in the backdrop of which the present proceedings have arisen, were set out in paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Judgment dated 05.07.2011 as under :-

    “3. At the 135th meeting of the Board of Directors/Members of NOIDA Authority (for short ‘NOIDA Board’) held on 5.6.2006, the said State Policy dated 22.5.2006 to attract more capital investment in tourism/hotel industry was considered. The NOIDA Board resolved to implement the said policy in the areas falling within its jurisdiction and apply the rates applicable to its Industrial area (Phase I) to the plots to be allotted to the hotel industry. The rate referred was the reserve rate of Rs.7400/- per sq.m. applicable to Industrial Area (Phase I) plots, fixed by the NOIDA Board at its meeting held on 20.3.2006.

    4. The resolution also mentioned that the implementation of the said policy should ensure construction of sufficient hotels before the Commonwealth Games to be held in Delhi, which were scheduled to commence in October, 2010. Having regard to the importance of the matter, the Principal Secretary, Tourism, the Commissioner, Meerut Circle and the Director of Industries of the U.P. Government, attended the said meeting as special invitees.

    5. At a meeting held by the Circle Commissioner, Meerut on 2.7.2006 with officials of NOIDA Authority, he communicated the direction that construction of Hotels should be completed before the commencement of the Commonwealth Games. At the said meeting the following 14 plots were identified as being suitable for allotment as hotels/plots : (a) six plots each measuring 40000 square metre for 5 star hotels in Sectors 96, 97 and 98; (b) five plots each measuring 20000 square metre for 4 star hotels in Sectors 72, 101, 105, 124 and 135; and (c) three plots for 3 star hotels (measuring 20000, 20000 & 10000 square metre) in Sectors 62, 63, and 142.

    6. In view of the Government’s Policy dated 22.5.2006 and the decisions taken at the meeting chaired by the Commissioner, Meerut Circle on 6.7.2006, the NOIDA Board took the following decisions at its 136th meeting held on 14.7.2006 :

    (i) It approved the proposal for making provision for hotels in reserved commercial area – Zone C 3 (as hotels had not been permitted in commercial areas C-1 and C-2 of the master plan reserved for wholesale and retail activities and as there was demand for hotels due to Commonwealth Games 2010) and directed inclusion thereof in the approved proposed NOIDA Master Plan 2021 and reference to the State Government for its approval.

    (ii) It decided to launch the Hotel Plot Allotment Scheme and authorized the CEO to finalise the terms and conditions for allotment, so as to ensure construction of hotels by the allottees before the commencement of the Commonwealth Games.

    In pursuance of the said decision, NOIDA Authority sent a communication dated 20.7.2006 to the State Government seeking approval of its decision to make a provision for hotels in commercial areas under Zone 3 and inclusion of it in NOIDA Master Plan, 2021.

    7. The Secretary, Sports & Youth Affairs, Government of India, held meetings with NOIDA Authority officials on 28.7.2006 and 22.8.2006 in connection with preparations for Commonwealth Games scheduled in October, 2010. At those meetings, the Secretary, Sports & Youth Affairs stressed t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top