SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 767

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, INDU MALHOTRA, K.M.JOSEPH
FIROZ IQBAL KHAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anoop George Chaudhari, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Elanchezhiyan, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Nisha Bambhani, Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhatia, AORMr. Shyam Diwan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bijendar Singh, Adv. Ms. Amita Sachdeva, Adv. Mr. Chanakya Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mallika Parmar, Adv. Mr. Vinay Rajput, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Sugandha Yadav, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR Mr. Anas Tanwir, AOR Mr. Gautam Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat, AOR Mr. Shourya Dasgupta, Adv. Mr. Bharat Gupta, Adv. Ms. Shahrukh Alam, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR Mr. Shantanu Singh, Adv. Ms. Ankur Gulyani Panda, Adv. Mr. Navneet R., Adv. Ms. Sonali Jain, Adv. Mr. Anshuman Ashok, Adv.

ORDER :

1. Applications for interventions are allowed.

2. On 28 August 2020, the writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was moved for urgent directions since the telecast of a programme titled “Bindaas Bol” was to take place at 8 pm on Sudarshan news, the news channel of the fifth respondent. The petitioner relied on the transcript of a promotional clip of forty-nine seconds. The contention was that the clip contains statements which are derogatory of the entry of Muslims in the civil services. The Court declined to issue a pre-broadcast interlocutory injunction, furnishing the following reasons in paragraph 8 of the order :-

    “8. At this stage, we have desisted from imposing a pre-broadcast interlocutory injunction on the basis of an unverified transcript of a forty nine second clip. The Court has to be circumspect in imposing a prior restraint on publication or the airing of views. We note that under statutory provisions, competent authorities are vested with powers to ensure compliance with law, including provisions of the criminal law intended to ensure social harmony and the peaceful coexistence of all communities.”

3. Several interlocutory applications have been move

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top