SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
L. NAGESWARA RAO, VINEET SARAN, JJ.
UNION OF INDIA - APPELLANT
VERSUS
R.K. SHARMA & ORS. - RESPONDENTS
Civil Appeal No. 1583 of 2021(@SLP (C) No.11599 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1611 of 2021(@SLP (C) No.1807 of 2021) Civil Appeal No. 1644 of 2021(@SLP (C) No.12665 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 1580 of 2021(@SLP (C) No.28112 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 1616 of 2021(@SLP (C) No.2068 of 2021) Civil Appeal No. 1615 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.1811 of 2021) Civil Appeal No. 1610 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.1806 of 2021) Civil Appeal No. 1584 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11613 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1601 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.15773 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1585 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11749 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1581 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11211 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1582 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11337 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1590 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11939 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1588 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11849 of 2020) Civil Appeal No.1612 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.1808 of 2021) Civil Appeal No. 1586 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11776 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1602 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.15774 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1595 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.12123 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1593 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.12035 of 2020) Civil Appeal No.1594 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.12042 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1613 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.1809 of 2021) Civil Appeal No. 1598 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.13074 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1591 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.12021 of 2020) Civil Appeal No.1596 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.12463 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1587 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11803 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1589 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.11903 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 1614 of 2021 (@SLP (C) No.1810 of 2021)
Decided on : 28-04-2021
Service Law – Promotion – Implementation of Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) for civilian employees of Central Government – Salient features of MACPS recommended by 6th Pay Commission are that three increments shall be granted to employees on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years of service – According to scheme of MACP, financial upgradation will be admissible on completion of 10 years of continuous service in same grade pay – Schemes are in nature of incentive schemes which were brought into force to relieve stagnation – MACPS is a matter of Government policy pursuant to recommendations made by Pay Commission – Respondents and other similarly situated employees are entitled for financial upgradation under MACPS only to next grade pay and not to grade pay of next promotional post – Benefits flowing from ACP & MACP Schemes are incentives and are not part of pay – Resolution dated 29.08.2008 is made effective from 01.09.2008 for implementation of allowances other than Pay and DA which includes financial upgradation under ACP & MACP Schemes – Respondents and other similarly situated officers are not entitled to seek implementation of benefits of MACPS w.e.f. 01.01.2006 according to resolution dated 29.08.2008 – Implementation of MACPS by granting financial upgradation only to next grade pay in pay band and not granting pay of next promotional post w.e.f. 01.01.2006 would be detrimental to a large number of employees, particularly those who have retired – Uniform implementation of MACPS for civilian employees w.e.f. 01.01.2006 would result in large scale recoveries of amounts paid in excess – Judgment of High Court set aside. (Paras 4, 8, 9 and 10)
Facts of the case:
Short question that falls for consideration of this Court in these Appeals is whether the Government of India is justified in implementing the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) for civilian employees of the Central Government in Groups ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’, ‘D’ and officers in the All India Services, Chairpersons, Members of the Regulatory Bodies (except Reserve Bank of India) with effect from 01.09.2008 and not from 01.01.2006.
Findings of Court:
Respondents and other similarly situated employees are entitled for financial upgradation under MACPS only to the next grade pay and not to the grade pay of next promotional post.
Result : Appeals allowed.
JUDGMENT :
L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.
1. The short question that falls for consideration of this Court in these Appeals is whether the Government of India is justified in implementing the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (for short, ‘MACPS’) for civilian employees of the Central Government in Groups ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’, ‘D’ and officers in the All India Services, Chairpersons, Members of the Regulatory Bodies (except the Reserve Bank of India) with effect from 01.09.2008 and not from 01.01.2006. For the sake of convenience, we are referring to the facts of Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.15572 of 2019.
2. The Respondent was appointed as Deputy Director in the Bureau of Industrial Costs and Prices in Ministry of Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion which was subsequently merged with Tariff Commission. He was promoted as Director in grade pay of Rs.3700-125-4700-50-5000 by an order dated 09.02.1994. Certain recommendations were made by the 5th Central Pay Commission relating to the Assured Career Progression Scheme (for short, ‘ACPS’) for Central Government civilian employees in all the Ministries/Departments which came into force w.e.f. 01.01.1996. Department of Personnel and Training by a memorandum dated 09.08.1999 directed implementation of the recommendations of the 5th Pay Commission regarding ACPS in respect of Group ‘D’, ‘C’ and ‘B’ officers and those holding isolated posts in Group ‘A’. The relevant conditions that were laid down for grant of benefits under the ACPS are as under:
2. The highest pay-scale upto which the financial upgradation under the Scheme was available was be Rs.14,300-18,300. Beyond this level, there shall be no financial upgradation and higher posts were filled strictly on vacancy based promotions.
4. The first financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme shall be allowed after 12 years of regular service and the second financial upgradation after 12 years of regular service from the date of the first financial upgradation subject to fulfillment of prescribed conditions. In other words, if the first upgradation gets postponed on account of the employee not found fit or due to departmental proceedings, etc. this would have consequential effect on the second upgradation which would also get deferred accordingly.
5.1. Two financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme in the entire Government service career of an employee shall be counted against regular promotions (including in-situ promotion and fast-track promotions availed through limited Departmental Competitive Examination) availed from the grade in which an employee was appointed as a direct recruit. This shall mean that two financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme shall be available only if no regular promotions during the prescribed periods (12 and 24 years) have been availed by the employee if an employee has already got one regular promotion he shall qualify for second financial upgradation only on completion of 24 years of regular service under the In case two prior promotions on regular basis have already been received by an employee, no benefit under the ACP Scheme shall accrue to him.
In respect of Organized Group 'A' services, the Government has provided non-functional financial upgradation for the officers in PB-3 and PB-4 who are senior by two years or more to IAS officers (in particular grade) but have not so far been promoted to that particular grade because of lack of promotional avenues in Tariff Commission.
In respect of General Civil Service Group 'A' officers, whether holding isolated post or not {and also for Group 'B' & 'C' employees), the Government has provided financial upgradation by way of extending MAC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.