Arnab Manoranjan Goswami vs State Of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(SC) 781

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, INDIRA BANERJEE
Arnab Manoranjan Goswami – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Harish Salve, Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Mr. Abaad Ponda, Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Mr. Saket Shukla, Mr. Vasanth Rajasekaran, Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. Debarshi Dutta, Mr. Rajat Pradhan, Mr. Biswadeep Chakravorty, Ms. Madhavi Doshi, Mr. Sanjeev Sambasivan, Mr. Siddhant Kumar, Ms. Kajri Roy, Ms. Chetna N. Rai, Ms. Sheena Iype, Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Ms. Rashi Bansal, Ms. Esha Bhadoria, Mr. Sameer Singh, Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Mr. Vijay Agarwal, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, Mr. Ishwar Nankni, Mr. Aditya Kanodia, Mr. Samir Ali Khan, Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Mr. Nishant Rao, Mr. Ankit Kohli, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Kabil Sibal, Mr. Amit Desai, Mr.Devdatta Kamat, Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Mr. Sachin Patil, Mr. Dipak Thakre, Mr. Hemant Shah, Mr. Geo Joseph, Mr. C. U. Singh, Mr. F. I. Choudhury, Mr. Noor Ul Islam, Mr. Vaibhav Karnik, Adv.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard Mr Harish Salve, Mr Mukul Rohatgi, Mr Siddharth Bhatnagar and Mr Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants.

3. Mr Kapil Sibal, learned Senior Counsel appears on behalf of the State of Maharashtra, Mr Amit Desai, learned Senior Counsel appears on behalf of the second respondent and Mr C U Singh, learned Senior Counsel appears on behalf of the fifth respondent.

4. Mr Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General appears on behalf of the Union of

India.

5. The third respondent, namely, the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai need not be served separately having regard to the appearance by Mr Kapil Sibal and Mr Amit Desai, respectively, for the State and for the investigating officer.

6. Arguments have been heard during the course of the day.

7. The appeals before this Court arise from the order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai dated 9 November 2020, by which the applications for the grant of the interim bail moved by the appellants pending the disposal of their writ petitions have been rejected.

8. The submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the rival contesting parties w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(SC) 781

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, INDIRA BANERJEEArnab Manoranjan Goswami – AppellantVersusState Of Maharashtra – Respondent

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, INDIRA BANERJEE
Arnab Manoranjan Goswami – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent