SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 787

DEEPAK GUPTA, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Re Exploitation of Children In Orphanages In The State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Zulfiker Ali P.S. Ms. Shahrukh Alam, Adv. Mr. Thoyyib Hudawai, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat, A.C. Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Avijitmani Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Upendra Mishra, Adv. Mr. K. V. Kharlyngdoh, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Rajshri Dubey, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Sushil, Adv. Mr. Rajendra A. Adv. Dr. Anindita Pujari, AOR Mr. Om Narayan, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Adv. Ms Tanushree Luthra,Adv. Mr. Deval Singh, Adv. Ms. A. Subhashini, AOR Mr. Kuldip Singh, AOR Mr. Abhishek Atrey, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Mr. V. G. Pragasam, AOR Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv. Mr. S. Manuraj, Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, AOR Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv. Ms. G. Indira, AOR Mr. S. Thananjayan, AOR Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad, AOR Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, Adv. Ms. Shalya Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, AOR Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, AOR Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Rajarajesh Waran S. Adv. Ms. Uma Prasuna Bachu, Adv. Ms. Madhvi Diwan, ASG Ms. Vaishali Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajnish Prasad, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Adit Khorana, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Mr. Sanjeeb Panigrahi, AOR Mr. Vikas Mahajan, AAG Mr. Aakash Varma, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Dubey, Adv. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AOR Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR M/S. Corporate Law Group, AOR Ms. Garima Prashad, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Manendra Pal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR Mrs. Swarupama Chaturvedi, AOR Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR Mr. Srikaanth S. Adv. Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Mr. Jishnu M.L. Adv. Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Adv. Ms. Beena Prakash, Adv. Mr. Suhaan Mukerji, Adv. Mr. Vishal Prasad, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Manchanda, Adv. Ms. Kajal Dalal, Adv. M/S. Plr Chambers And Co., AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AOR Mr. Ritesh Khatri, AOR Mr. Yajur Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Adv. Mr. Deepak Amota, Adv. Mr. Bharat Upreti Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A., AOR Ms. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Zulfiker Ali P. S, AOR Mr. Avijit Nani Tripathi, AOR, Mr. T.K. Nayak, Adv. Mr. Shaurya Sahay, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Adv. Ms. Deeanwita Priyanka, Adv. Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal, Adv. Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv. Mr. Arshiya Ghose, Adv. Mr. Divyansh Tiwari, Adv. Ms. A. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. T.N. Rama Rao, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. G.N. Reddy, Adv. Mr. T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Harichandran, Adv. Mr. T.V. Veera Reddy, Adv. Dr. Rajesh Pandey, Adv. Ms. Tanuja Mujari Patra, Adv. Ms. Shweta Mulchandani, Adv. Ms. Aswathi M.K. Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms Swati Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, Adv. Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv. Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Mr. Basant R, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Basant, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Adv. Ms. R. Bala Subramanian, Sr. Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anand Kr. Dubey, Adv.

ORDER :

I.A. NO. 24585 OF 2020

1. This is an I.A. moved by the amicus curiae seeking some directions. On 5/12/2018 while disposing of WP(C) No. 102/2007, we had given liberty to the amicus curiae to revive the matter(s) after the report prepared by the Union of India through the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR for short), is made available to her.

2. This obviously envisages that reports were to be furnished to the amicus curiae so that she can decide whether to revive the matter(s). We direct NCPCR and the Union of India to furnish reports, if any, within three weeks from today so that amicus curiae has all the requisite information.

3. The amicus curiae has also drawn our attention to two instances and certain allegations which have appeared in the newspapers related to children being detained in police custody and being tortured in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. We direct notice to be issued to the Uttar Pradesh State Commission for Protection of Child Rights and Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights, who may submit their responses within three weeks from today.

4. The NCPCR may also look into the matter(s) and submit a report within three weeks from tod

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top