SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 2011

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Indore Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Kapur, AOR Ms. Mansi Kapur, Adv. Ms. Megha Karnwal, Adv. Ms. Shubhra Kapur, Adv. Mr. Archit Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Dhruv S., Adv. Ms. Natasha Dalmia, Adv. Ms. Harshika Verma, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikas Kumar, AOR Mr. Manish Paliwal, Adv. Mr. Abhishek, Adv. Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv. Ms. Christi Jain, AOR Mr. Harsh Jain, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Ankita Gupta, Adv.

ORDER :

1. Vide order dated 18.04.2016, this matter was directed to be listed after the decision in SLP(Civil) No.10742/2008. The same has since been decided in “Indore Development Authority Vs. Shailendra (Dead) Through Lrs. And Ors.”, (2018) 2 SCALE 1.

2. A copy of order dated 21.02.2018 in SLP(C) No. 5552/2018 CC. No.8453/2017 titled “State of Haryana and Ors. Vs. M/S. G.D. Goenka Tourism Corporation Limited & Anr.” has been shown to this Court by Mr. Rohatgi, senior Advocate.

3. We are of the view that having regard to the nature of the issues involved in the matter, the issues need to be resolved by a larger Bench at the earliest.

4. These matters may be placed before the appropriate Bench tomorrow i.e. 23rd February, 2018, as per orders of Hon’ble The Chief Justice of India.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top