SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 784

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.
Amish Devgan - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors - Respondent
Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 160 of 2020
Decided On : 26-06-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vivek Jain, AOR Mr. Mrinal Bharti, Adv. Ms. Suchitra Kumbhat, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rizwan Merchant, Adv. Mr. S. Hariharan, Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, AOR

Headnote:

Criminal Laws – FIR on News Debate – Senior counsel appearing for petitioner and Mr. Rizwan Merchant, learned counsel appearing for the complainant in FIR PS- Itwara, Nanded, Maharashtra and FIR PS- Paidhuni, Mumbai, Maharashtra. – Held, Court is inclined to issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 08.07.2020 – Court direct the petitioner to implead the complainant(s) in the respective FIRs/complaints referred to in the petition in connection with the News Debate Show called “Aar Paar” aired at around 7:30 p.m. – Order Accordingly

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Rizwan Merchant, learned counsel appearing for the complainant in FIR No. 218 dated 17.06.2020 PS- Itwara, Nanded, Maharashtra and FIR No. 175 dated 18.06.2020, PS- Paidhuni, Mumbai, Maharashtra.

2. After considering the rival submissions, we are inclined to issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 08.07.2020.

3. We direct the petitioner to implead the complainant(s) in the respective FIRs/complaints referred to in the petition in connection with the News Debate Show called “Aar Paar” dated 15.06.2020 aired at around 7:30 p.m.

4. Amended copy of the petition be filed within three days from today by email/online.

5. Issue notice to the newly added respondents also.

6. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

7. Liberty is also granted to serve the Standing Counsel for the concerned States and Central Agency representing Union of India.

8. As regards the interim relief, till the next date of hearing, we deem it appropriate to pass ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (A) and (B) of the stay application which read thus:

    “A. Pass an order staying further proceedings in the FIR No. 78, PS: Dargah, Ajmer, Rajasthan; FIR No. 50, PS: Makbara, Kota, Rajasthan; FIR No. 173, PS: Bahadurpura, Hyderabad City, Telangana; FIR No. 218, PS: Itwara, Nanded, Maharashtra; FIR No. 217, PS: Paidhuni, Mumbai, Maharashtra or any other FIR/FIRs or any criminal complaint which has been filed or which may be filed hereafter, relating to the same telecast dated 15.06.2020 of the petitioner.

    B. Pass an order that the petitioner be protected against any coercive process arising out of and in relation to the FIR No. 78, PS: Dargah, Ajmer, Rajasthan; FIR No. 50, PS: Makbara, Kota, Rajasthan; FIR No. 173, PS: Bahadurpura, Hyderabad City, Telangana; FIR No. 218, PS: Itwara, Nanded, Maharashtra; FIR No. 217, PS: Paidhuni, Mumbai, Maharashtra or any other FIR/FIRs or any criminal complaint which has been filed or which may be filed hereafter, relating to the same telecast dated 15.06.2020 of the petitioner.”

9. Liberty is granted to the complainant(s) who are represented by Mr. Rizwan Merchant to file link of original broadcast within one week from today.

10. As prayed, liberty is granted to the petitioner to provide correct FIR number in Annexure-P9.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top