SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. Gavai, Krishna Murari, JJ.
Sorathia Bindi - Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
The State of Gujarat & Anr. - Respondent(s)
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3162 of 2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-03-2021 in CRLMA No. 4045/2021 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)
Decided On : 01-06-2021
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 438 – Anticipatory bail – Grant of – Restraint on arrest of accused – FIR lodged by petitioner against respondent no.2 is for offences under Sections 376(2)(F), 376(2)(N), 377, 354(A), 354(D), 503, 506(1) and 509 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(E) and 67(A) of Information Technology Act, 2000 – In such serious matter, when High Court exercised its power of granting ad interim protection from arrest to respondent no.2 herein, least that is expected by High Court is to record some reasons as to why it chooses to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction – No reason even for namesake has been recorded in impugned order – Matter remitted to High Court – High Court would consider question of grant of anticipatory bail or ad interim anticipatory bail by recording reasons in support of its order – Petitioner is at liberty to apply for assisting prosecution in the proceedings and Single Judge would grant an opportunity of being heard to petitioner before passing orders in proceedings initiated at behest of respondent no.2 herein – Orders be passed in any event prior to 11.06.2021. (Paras 2, 3, 4 and 5)
Facts of the case:
Petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order passed by Single Judge, High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad thereby issuing notice on the application for anticipatory bail filed by the respondent no.2 herein. While doing so, Single Judge has also directed that respondent no.2 herein shall not be arrested in the meanwhile.
Findings of Court:
Registrar (Judicial) of this Court is directed to communicate this order forthwith to the Registrar (Judicial) of High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, who shall place the same before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the High Court of Gujarat.
Result : Special Leave Petition disposed of with observations.
ORDER
Permission to appear and argue in person is granted.
2. We have heard the petitioner-in-person and perused the record.
3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad thereby issuing notice on the application for anticipatory bail filed by the respondent no.2 herein. While doing so, the learned Single Judge has also directed that respondent no.2 herein shall not be arrested in the meanwhile.
4. The First Information Report (FIR) lodged by the petitioner against the respondent no.2 is for the offences under sections 376(2)(F), 376(2)(N), 377, 354(A), 354(D), 503, 506(1) and 509 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 66(E) and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
5. In such serious matter, when the High Court exercised its power of granting ad interim protection from arrest to the respondent no.2 herein, the least that is expected by the High Court is to record some reasons as to why it chooses to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction.
6. From the perusal of the impugned order, it could clearly be seen, that no reason even for namesake has been recorded in the impugned order. We therefore remit the matter to the High Court. Let the matter be placed before the concerned learned Single Judge of the High Court dealing with the applications for anticipatory bail on 07.06.2021, on which date the High Court would consider the question of grant of anticipatory bail or ad interim anticipatory bail by recording reasons in support of its order.
7. Needless to state, that the present petitioner is at liberty to apply for assisting the prosecution in the said proceedings and the learned Single Judge would grant an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner before passing orders in the proceedings initiated at the behest of the respondent no.2 herein. The orders be passed in any event prior to 11.06.2021.
8. The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court is directed to communicate this order forthwith to the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, who shall place the same before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the High Court of Gujarat.
9. The instant special leave petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
10. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.