SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah, JJ.
Central Bank of India & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Santosh Kumar Mohapatra – Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos. 2297-2298 of 2021 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 7497-7498 of 2021)
Decided On : 01-07-2021
Service Law – Promotion – Single Judge directed appellants to consider case of respondent for promotion which was the order under challenge in appeal – Writ appeal was not premature – There has been no application of mind by Division Bench of High Court to merits of writ appeal – Impugned order of Division Bench of High Court set aside and Writ Appeal restored to file of Division Bench. (Paras 3 and 5)
Facts of the case:
Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa, by its order dated 23rd February 2021, dismissed writ appeal filed against judgment of Single Judge by appellants on the ground that it is premature.
Findings of Court:
Writ appeal, being WA 382 of 2020, is restored to the file of the Division Bench. Upon the writ appeal being mentioned for early listing, we request the Division Bench to take it up expeditiously in view of the fact that the respondent, as stated by his counsel, is due to retire within four months and the issue pertains to his being considered for promotion.
Result : Appeals disposed of.
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. The Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa, by its order dated 23 February 2021, dismissed the writ appeal filed against the judgment of the Single Judge by the appellants on the ground that it is premature.
3. We find substance in the grievance of the appellants which has been urged by Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned Senior Counsel, that there has been no application of mind by the Division Bench of the High Court to the merits of the writ appeal. The Single Judge directed the appellants to consider the case of the respondent for promotion, which was the order under challenge in appeal. The writ appeal was not premature.
4. Mr. Monish Panda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, on caveat, submits that a considerable delay has taken place and the respondent is due to retire within a period of four months.
5. This ground which has been urged on behalf of the respondent be sufficiently taken note of by requesting the High Court to expeditiously consider the writ appeal upon a remand which becomes necessary by reason of the fact that the High Court has not dealt with the merits of the challenge in the appeal. Accordingly, in order to facilitate this exercise and without expressing any opinion on the rival contentions, we set aside the impugned order of the Division Bench of the High Court dated 23 February 2021. The writ appeal, being WA 382 of 2020, is restored to the file of the Division Bench. Upon the writ appeal being mentioned for early listing, we request the Division Bench to take it up expeditiously in view of the fact that the respondent, as stated by his counsel, is due to retire within four months and the issue pertains to his being considered for promotion.
6. The appeals are accordingly disposed of.
7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.