SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HEMANT GUPTA
Ripudaman Singh – Appellant
Versus
Tikka Maheshwar Chand – Respondent
ORDER :
Leave granted.
1. The plaintiff is in appeal before this Court challenging the judgment and decree passed by the High Court on 28.10.2006 whereby appeal filed by the defendant was allowed and the suit for declaration challenging the orders passed in mutation proceedings was dismissed.
2. The parties herein are the two sons of Late Vijendra Singh. The appellant filed a suit for possession in the year 1978 disputing the Will dated 04.12.1958 executed in favour of the defendant. The appellant claimed half share of the land as described in the plaint. During the pendency of suit, a decree was passed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. The terms of compromise read as under:
The plaintiff shall be owner of Khasra No. 516/1 area measuring 27 Kanals 11 Marlas and the defendant shall also pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 10,000/- within one mo
Kale and Others v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and Others
Ravinder Kaur Grewal and Others v. Manjit Kaur and Others
Bhoop Singh v. Ram Singh Major and Others
K. Raghunandan and Others v. Ali Hussain Sabir and Others
Phool Patti and Another v. Ram Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. and Another
Phool Patti and Another v. Ram Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.