SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 336

INDU MALHOTRA, AJAY RASTOGI
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION LTD. – Respondent


ORDER :

INDU MALHOTRA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The present Appeal arises out of the Judgment passed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 wherein the Single Judge vide Order dated 10.04.2019 has substantially set aside the Award dated 27.04.2016 passed by a threemember tribunal. It has been observed that the arbitral tribunal has drawn incorrect inferences from the documents on record, and has not considered vital and relevant evidence in reaching its conclusions. On this basis, a substantial number of claims and counter claims were rejected, granting liberty to the parties to reagitate their claims, and counter claim (a) afresh in accordance with law.

3. Aggrieved by the judgment of the Single Judge, cross appeals were filed by both parties under Section 37 before the Division Bench. The Division Bench vide the impugned interim Order dated 04.12.2019 directed that the Appeals be confined to the findings with respect to claim nos. 1(i) and (ii); and counter claim (a).

4. The Appellant-NHAI filed the present Appeal to challenge the interim Order dated 04.12.2019.

5. During the pendency of the present Appeal, the parties agreed to a fresh adjudication of all the cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top