SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 410

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, VINEET SARAN, JJ.
THE STATE OF KERALA - Petitioner
VERSUS
ANIL KUMAR & ORS. – Respondent
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2256/2021
Decided On : 17-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Basanth R., Sr. Adv. Mr. Suman Chakravarthi, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Ms. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv.

The court's decision not to interfere in the impugned judgment and the specific observations regarding the learned Single Judge's remarks.

Headnote:

Court's Observations - Impugned Judgment - The court observed that the observations made by the learned Single Judge in para 20 of the impugned order shall be ignored by the Court. The directions given, if any, shall not be given effect to. They are issued in the facts of this case only. They should not be taken as general in nature.

Fact of the Case:

The court heard the petitioner's counsel and found no ground to interfere in the impugned judgment. The Special Leave Petition stands disposed of with the observation mentioned.

Finding of the Court:

The court did not find any ground to interfere in the impugned judgment and disposed of the Special Leave Petition with specific observations regarding the learned Single Judge's remarks.

Issues: The issue was whether to interfere in the impugned judgment and the observations made by the learned Single Judge.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided not to interfere in the impugned judgment and issued specific observations regarding the learned Single Judge's remarks, stating that they should be ignored and not taken as general in nature.

Final Decision: The Special Leave Petition stands disposed of with an observation that the observations made by the learned Single Judge in para 20 of the impugned order shall be ignored by the Court. The directions given, if any, shall not be given effect to. They are issued in the facts of this case only. They should not be taken as general in nature.

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. We do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned judgment. The Special Leave Petition stands disposed of with an observation that the observations made by the learned Single Judge in para 20 of the impugned order shall be ignored by the Court. The directions given, if any, shall not be given effect to. They are issued in the facts of this case only. They should not be taken as general in nature.

3. Pending application, if any stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top