Back
2016 Supreme(SC) 1738
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, JJ.
RANJEET NABHA - Petitioners
Vs.
UDITA NABHA - Respondents
Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32082/2016
Decided On : 28-11-2016
For the Petitioners: Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv., Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ankit Virmani, Adv., Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Adv.,Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv.,Mr. Jyoti Prakash Sahu, Adv.,Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv., Ms. Swati Sumbly, Adv., Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan, Adv., Mr. Shadan Farasat, Adv.
Dismissal of Special Leave Petition and Grant of Time for Deposit
Headnote:
Special Leave Petition - Dismissal with Grant of Time for Deposit - The court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and granted the petitioner two months to deposit the directed amount, with a warning of dismissal of the appeal if the amount is not deposited within the stipulated time.
Fact of the Case:
The court heard the senior counsel from both sides and found no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition, dismissing it accordingly. The petitioner was granted two months to deposit the directed amount, with a warning of dismissal of the appeal if the amount is not deposited within the stipulated time. Pending interlocutory applications were disposed of.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition and dismissed it. The petitioner was granted a period of two months to deposit the directed amount, with a warning of dismissal of the appeal if the amount is not deposited within the stipulated time. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, were disposed of.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi:
Final Decision: The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was granted a period of two months to deposit the directed amount, with a warning of dismissal of the appeal if the amount is not deposited within the stipulated time. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, were disposed of.
ORDER :
1. Heard the learned senior counsel appearing on both the sides.
2. We find no reason to entertain this Special Leave Petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed.
3. However, the petitioner is granted a period of two months to deposit the amount as directed by the High Court, making it clear that in case the amount, as above, is not deposited within the stipulated time, the appeal before the High Court shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of.
