The court's decision was based on the absence of any mistake apparent on the face of the record warranting a review.

Headnote:
Review Petition - Interlocutory Application - The court rejected the permission to make oral submissions in the review petition and dismissed the review petitions as the judgment did not suffer from any mistake apparent on the face of the record.
Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought review of the Judgment dated November 27, 2012.
Finding of the Court:

The court rejected the permission to make oral submissions in the review petition and dismissed the review petitions as the judgment did not suffer from any mistake apparent on the face of the record.
Issues: Interlocutory Application for permission to make oral submissions in Review Petition, Review of the Judgment dated November 27, 2012
Ratio Decidendi: The judgment did not suffer from any mistake apparent on the face of the record warranting any review.
Final Decision: Review Petitions are dismissed.

ORDER :

1. Interlocutory Application Nos. 1-2 of 2013 for permission to make oral submissions in Review Petition (Civil) Nos. 905-906 OF 2013 are rejected.

2. Delay condoned.

3. By these petitions, the petitioners seek review of the Judgment dated November 27, 2012.

4. We have carefully considered the Review Petitions and the available material. The above Judgment does not suffer from any mistake apparent on the face of the record warranting any review.

5. Review Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document