SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 728

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.
JAYPEE KENSINGTON BOULEVARD APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS. - Appellants
Vs.
NBCC (INDIA) LTD & ORS. - Respondents
Civil Appeal No(s). 3395/2020
WITH
T.C.(C) No. 234/2020 (XVI-A)
Decided on : 02-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Adv., Mr. Shashank Manish, AOR, Ms. Nidhi Sahay, Adv., Ms. Manasi Chatpalliwar, Adv., Mr. Parag P Tripathi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sumant Batra, Adv., Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Adv., Ms. Niharika Sharma, Adv., Mr. Rahul Mendiratta, Adv., Ms. Mishika Bajpai, Adv., Ms. Shubhangi jain, Adv., Ms. Akansha Srivastava, Adv., Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR, Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOr, Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, ADv., Mr. Pravar Veer Misra, Adv., Mr. R.K. Raizada,Sr. Adv., Mr. Rajeev Dubey, Adv., Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AOR, Mr. Sahil Narang, AOR, Mr. S. S. Shroff, AOR, Mr. Divyam Agarwal, AOR, Mr. Vishal Gupta, AOR, M/S. Dua Associates, AOR, Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR, M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, AOR, Mr. Hasan Murtaza, AOR, Mr. Shariq Ahmed, Adv., Mr. Tariq Ahmed, Adv., Mr. Saju Jakob, Adv., Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, AOR, , Mr. Amit Pawan, AOR, Mr. Sachin Sharma, AOR, Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR, Mr. Ram Lal Roy, AOR

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 32 - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Section 233 - Interim Resolution - Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Affidavit - Emanating from F.I.R - Uttar Pradesh Police has handled this case emanating Police Station Beta-II in District Greater including to take extreme step to arrest Interim Resolution Professional who was working in that capacity pursuant to order passed by Court and entrusted with functioning of Company - It is seen that police official dealing with case is not familiar with provision of privilege of interim resolution appointed by the Court – Held, Court direct immediate release of applicant, Anuj Jain, who is presently in custody of Police Station, Beta-II, District Greater and had been produced today Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate - Court further direct the Investigating Officer not to take any coercive action against applicant in connection with subject F.I.R. until further orders - Court also issue notice to Investigating Officer Sub-Inspector, as to why appropriate action is not taken against him for taking such drastic action against applicant - He shall file his personal affidavit explaining the position within two weeks from today - District Greater through e-mail and Registrar of this Court shall personally intimate office of concerned Judge on telephone to ensure immediate release of the applicant – Ordered Accordingly.

ORDER :

I.A. No………..in T.C. No.234/2020

1. We have heard Mr. Parag Tripathi, and Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned senior counsel for the applicant, Mr. Anuj Jain.

2. We are appalled to see that the manner in which the Uttar Pradesh Police has handled this case emanating from F.I.R. No.0098/2021, registered at Police Station Beta-II in District Greater Noida, including to take the extreme step to arrest the Interim Resolution Professional, Mr. Anuj Jain, who was working in that capacity pursuant to the order passed by the Court and entrusted with the functioning of the Company in question.

3. It is seen that the police official dealing with the case is not familiar with the provision of privilege of interim resolution appointed by the Court, in terms of Section 233 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

4. Mr. R.K. Raizada, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh, on instructions, submits that the Investigating Officer, Mr. Bijendra Singh, was of the view that the applicant may leave India at any time to avoid the prosecution and for securing his presence thought it necessary to arrest him from Mumbai.

5. We will examine this aspect of the matter elaborately at appropriate time by treating this application as substantive writ petition filed by the applicant under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and to be numbered accordingly.

6. In the meantime, we direct immediate release of the applicant, Anuj Jain, who is presently in custody of Police Station, Beta-II, District Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh and had been produced today i.e. 02.03.2021 before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh.

7. We further direct the Investigating Officer not to take any coercive action against the applicant in connection with the subject F.I.R. until further orders.

8. We also issue notice to the Investigating Officer, Bijender Singh, Sub-Inspector, as to why appropriate action is not taken against him for taking such drastic action against the applicant. He shall file his personal affidavit explaining the position within two weeks from today.

9. List the writ petition after two weeks.

10. Copy of this order be forwarded to the office of the concerned Judge and Police Station Beta-II, District Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh through e-mail and the Registrar(Judl.) of this Court shall personally intimate the office of the concerned Judge on telephone to ensure immediate release of the applicant, Mr. Anuj Jain, without imposing any conditions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top