SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 936

MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, R.SUBHASH REDDY
Sandeep Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Arvind S. Avhad, AOR, for the Appellant; Mr. K.M. Natrajan, ASG, for the Respondent

ORDER

1. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has created about 555 fake firms and has committed fraud to the tune of Rs. 74,00,00,000/- (Rupees seventy four crore only).

2. Mr. K.M. Natraj, learned additional solicitor general, submits that the investigation is still pending and more number of fake firms created by the petitioner are being detected.

3. It is not in dispute that the maximum punishment to be imposed on the petitioner, if convicted, is five years. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner has already undergone one year and eight months imprisonment. It is brought to our notice that some of the accused are released on bail.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances, we deem it appropriate to pass the following order:

5. The State shall make endeavour to complete the investigation within three months from today.

6. In case the investigation is not completed within three months from this day, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the Trial Court by imposing appropriate terms and conditions.

7. If the investigation is completed, the report shall be filed before the concerned court. In case, the investigation is c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top