SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 917

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, DINESH MAHESHWARI, HRISHIKESH ROY
Dharmesh @ Dharmendra @ Dhamo Jagdishbhai @ Jagabhai Bhagubhai Ratadia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Aastha Mehta, Advocate., for the Appellant; Ms. Vishakha, Advocate., Mr. Tushar Gokani, Advocate., Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Applications for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing official translation are allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the provisions which appear to have been relied upon in the impugned order i.e. Sections 357 and 357-A of the Criminal Procedure Code would apply only at the stage of conviction and not at the stage of grant of bail so far as payment of compensation to the victims are concerned.

3. We would like to examine the aforesaid issue as also the issue whether this is a fit case for grant of bail at all to the petitioners.

4. Issue notice returnable in two weeks.

5. Dasti service in addition through the standing counsel.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top