SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 904

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
L. Nageswara Rao, S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ.
Satpal & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Haryana - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No(s). 483 of 2016
Decided On : 29-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. K.T.S Tulsi, Sr.Advocate., Mr. Kuber Bodh, Advocate., Mr. Tanessa Puri, Advocate., Mr. Raj Kamal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Devender Kumar Saini, AAG, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate., Mr. Manindra Dubey, Advocate., Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate., for the Respondent.

Points Of Law : No likelihood of this appeal being heard soon - Direct release of appellants on bail subject to satisfaction of Trial Court.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302, 452 and 32 – Notice – Anticipatory bail – Appeal Against Conviction – Acquitted - Appellants charged under Section 302, 452 and 32 IPC and acquitted by Trial court - Judgment of Trial Court was reversed by High Court and they were convicted for aforesaid offences and sentenced to life imprisonment - Notice was issued on bail application on have heard learned Senior Counsel for appellants and learned counsel for state - Appeal was admitted on.

Finding Of The Court :

Court are informed that appellants have undergone sentence of seven years and eight months - As there is no likelihood of this appeal being heard soon Court direct release of appellants on bail subject to satisfaction of Trial.

Result : Appeal Allowed

ORDER

1. The appellants charged under Section 302, 452 and 32 IPC and acquitted by the Trial court. The judgment of the Trial Court was reversed by the High Court and they were convicted for the aforesaid offences and sentenced to life imprisonment.

2. Notice was issued on the bail application on 11.12.2020. We have heard learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the state.

3. Appeal was admitted on 5.08.2016.

4. We are informed that the appellants have undergone sentence of seven years and eight months.

5. As there is no likelihood of this appeal being heard soon, we direct the release of the appellants on bail subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

I.A. stands allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top