SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 923

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, KRISHNA MURARI
Himmat Singh – Appellant
Versus
Priyanka Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Harish N.Salve,Sr.Adv., Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar,Adv., Ms. Tulika Bhatnagar,Adv., Mr. S. S. Jauhar, AOR, for the Appellant; Mr. Trideep Pais,Adv., Ms. Sanya Kumar,Adv., Ms. Rakshanda Deka,Adv., Mr. G.V.Chandrashekar,Adv., Mr. N.K.Verma,Adv., Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar, AOR, for the Respondent

ORDER

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length. The impugned order being in the nature of an interim order pending consideration of the revision petition, we are not inclined to interfere with the same.

2. We, however, notice the observations in paragraph 11 which seem to suggest that the mother-in-law is being dragged into proceedings on account of her volunteering to fund the education of her granddaughters for the first two years. We may observe that this is a voluntary act and thus, the mother-in-law cannot be roped into these proceedings.

3. We, thus, dismiss the special leave petition with the aforesaid modification.

Pending applications shall also stand disposed of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top