SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 879

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HRISHIKESH ROY
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Chaitram Maywade – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Dy.A.G.
Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR
Ms. Rati Tandon,Adv., for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.

2. Heard the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State of Madhya Pradesh.

3. There has been an inordinate delay of 130 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and 200 days of delay in refiling the Special Leave Petition which has not been satisfactorily explained the State of M.P.

4. Even on merits, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.

5. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits.

6. Pending application filed in the matter also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top