SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 868

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HEMANT GUPTA
Karthik Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
B. Sarath Babu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Garima Jain, Adv, Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Aor, Ms. Pallavi Sengupta, Adv, Ms. Aakriti Priya, Adv, Mr. Aishwarya Choudhary, Adv, Ms. Lakshmi Rao, Adv, for the Appellant; Ms. Amrreeta Swaarup, Aor, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant suffered serious injuries in an accident resulting in 40% disability. The claim was preferred before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which assessed the amount of compensation at Rs.21,92,000/-. The Insurance Company, aggrieved by the same preferred an appeal before the High Court in terms of the judgment dated 24.09.2019 has reduced the compensation to Rs.3,40,000/-.

Notice was issued in the Special leave petitions confined to the aspect of future earnings and that is the only aspect which has been urged before us apart from the fact that the interest should be 9 per cent per annum instead of 7.5% per annum on account of the judgment in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi & Ors. - (2017) 16 SCC 680 .

Learned counsel for the appellant had relied upon the recent judgment of this Court in Erudhaya Priya v. State Express Transport Corporation Ltd. - 2020 SCC OnLine SC 601 . The judgment took into consideration the earlier judgments incl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top