SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 920

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Aniruddha Bose, J.
Sabita Shashank Singh - Appellant
Versus
Shashank Shekhar Singh - Respondent
Transfer Petition (C) No. 908 of 2019
Decided On : 01-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ashwani Garg, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Advocate, Mr. Anuradha Arputham, Advocate, for the Respondent.

Points of Law : Provisions of Article 142 - Jurisdiction to pass any order or decree to do complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it, a Judge sitting singly has power and jurisdiction to issue orders or pass decrees as specified – There is precedent for this proposition of law.

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code,1908 – Section,25 - Order VI - Rule (1) - Supreme Court Rules, 2013 - Divorce - Payment of a lumpsum - Court Uttar Pradesh- It has been pleaded in petition that parental home of petitioner is at NOIDA and she is undergoing treatment for certain ailment there- For these reasons she would be unable to travel to defend divorce petition- Moreover petitioner has filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights before Principal Judge Family Court notice was issued in this petition by a Bench consisting of two Hon'ble Judges of this Court and this Court also stayed further proceedings.

Finding of the Court :

Court intends to invoke provisions thereof must be pending before it- Annulment of marriage cannot be linked to any cause or matter pending before Court given case transfer petition arose out of matrimonial dispute between parties but expression 'cause or matter pending before it' cannot be stretched to cover all disputes originating from such matrimonial problem that can be resolved by this Court sitting singly while hearing a transfer petition court of opinion that joint application ought to be dealt with by a Bench comprising of two or more Hon'ble Judges as Hon'ble Chief Justice of India may consider appropriate - Since parties to present proceeding have otherwise settled their dispute through process of mediation transfer petition has lost its utility and stands disposed of- Let file be placed before Hon'ble Chief Justice of India for appropriate directions for giving effect to terms of settlement entered into by and between parties and broadly reflected in joint application.

Result : Order accordingly

ORDER

1. The matter is convened through Video Conferencing.

The present petition instituted under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 originates from a matrimonial dispute between the parties. The respondent-husband had instituted a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the Family Court at Pune, Maharashtra. The said petition for dissolution of the marriage of the parties was registered as P.A. No. 151/2019. In the present petition the main prayer of the petitioner-wife is for transfer of that divorce petition from the Family Court, Pune, Maharashtra to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. It has been pleaded in the petition that the parental home of the petitioner is at NOIDA and she is undergoing treatment for certain ailment there. For these reasons, she would be unable to travel to Pune to defend the divorce petition. Moreover, the petitioner has filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar. 2. On 8 th May, 2019, notice was issued in this petition by a Bench consisting of two Hon'ble Judges of this Court and this Court also stayed further proceedings of P.A. No. 151 of 2019. The matter was called on for hearing again on 21 st January, 2020. On that date, learned counsel appearing for the parties agreed before the Court that the matter could be settled through mediation. The parties were, accordingly, directed to appear before the Co-ordinator, Supreme Court Mediation Centre. The mediation process was successful and a settlement agreement has been arrived at on 15 th February, 2021. This settlement agreement forms part of records. The key terms of the settlement include withdrawal or quashing of three pending proceedings between the parties, as also filing of a joint application, inter-alia, for decree of divorce by mutual consent before this Court, invoking this Court's jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. There is provision for payment of a lumpsum amount to the petitioner-wife in the settlement agreement in case the decree of divorce by mutual consent is granted by this Court. The parties agreed to apply before this Court for dissolution of their marriage and have agreed to withdraw all remaining cases involving the parties on their family members.

3. The parties have subsequently filed a joint application for divorce by mutual consent of the parties invoking Article 142 of the Constitution of India. This application has been registered as I.A. No. 30625 of 2021. One of the main clauses of the settlement agreement stipulates:-

    "They shall file a petition jointly for decree of divorce and withdrawal of the aforesaid cases before Hon'ble Supreme Court invoking the inherent power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India for grant of divorce by mutual consent and for withdrawal/quashing/disposal of all pending case/complaints between the parties."

4. The question which I shall address now is as to whether in exercising my jurisdiction sitting singly, I can pass a decree for dissolving a marriage by mutual consent to which Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 applies in exercise of this Court's jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, by dispensing with the compliance of some of the procedural formalities and timeline contemplated in Section 13B of the 1955 Act. The Constitution of India vests this Court with the jurisdiction to pass any order or decree for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it. The Constitution of India does not specify the composition or strength of a Bench which could exercise such jurisdiction. This Court, however, has been conferred power under Article 145(2) of the Constitution of India for making rules for fixing the minimum number of Judges who are to sit for any purpose.

5. Article 145 of the Constitution of India lays down:-

    "145. Rules of Court, etc.- (1) Subject to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top