L.NAGESWARA RAO, HIMA KOHLI
Kshetrimayum Maheshkumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Manipur University – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hima Kohli, J.
Leave granted.
1. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment dated 21st August, 2017 passed by the High Court of Manipur at Imphal in Writ Petition (C) No. 753 of 2014 whereunder, amongst others, it has been held that after the amendment of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 20061[For short “the Reservation Act”], in the year 2012, on introduction of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Amendment Act, 20122[For short ‘the Amendment Act”], respondent No. 1 -Manipur University3[‘University’] is required to follow the reservation norms of 2% for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Caste [SC], 31% for the Scheduled Tribes [ST] and 17% for the Other Backward Classes [OBC] for purposes of admission in the University.
2. To contextualize the issue raised in the present appeal, it is necessary to briefly refer to the relevant facts of the case. Respondent no. 1University was initially established as a ‘State University’ under the Manipur University Act, 1980 that came into force on 05th June, 1980. In the year 2005, the Manipur University Act was legislated, whereafter respondent No. 1 – University was c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.