A. M. KHANWILKAR, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Alapan Bandyopadhyay – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C.T. RAVIKUAMR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. A legal conundrum calls for resolution in this case. The seminal question that created it is: ‘whether the bundle of facts that constitute the cause of action for filing an Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (for short ‘the Act’) and determinative of the place of its filing would remain as the decisive factor in case such an application is subsequently transferred from the Bench where it was filed to another Bench of the Tribunal falling under the territorial jurisdiction of another High Court, to ascertain the jurisdictional High Court to exercise the power of judicial review qua the order of transfer passed by the Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal at New Delhi in exercise of power under Section 25 of the Act’.
3. The Appellant assails the final judgment and order dated 29.10.2021 passed by the High Court at Calcutta in WPCT No.78/2021 whereby the High Court set aside the order dated 22.10.2021 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (New Delhi) in P.T.No.215/2021 transferring O.A.No.1619/2021, filed by the respondent herein, from Kolkata Bench to its fi
Braj Kishore Thakur v. Union of India
L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India
Navinchandra N. Majithia vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2000) 7 SCC 647 – Distinguished [Para 9]
Kusum Ingots and Alloys Limited vs. Union of India & Anr. (2004) 6 SCC 254 – Distinguished [Para 9]
JK Industries Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Nawal Kishore Sharma vs. Union of India & Ors. (2014) 9 SCC 329 – Distinguished [Para 9]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.