SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 967

HEMANT GUPTA, V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
M. S. Viswanathan – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu and the officials in the Department of Urban Land Ceiling have come up with the above appeals challenging: (i) an order of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissing an intra-court appeal and (ii) the subsequent order of the Division Bench refusing to condone the delay in seeking review of the original order.

2. We have heard Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, learned senior counsel for the appellant-State, Mr. E.C. Agrawala, learned counsel appearing for the respondents and Capt. R. Balasubramanian, learned senior counsel for the party seeking intervention.

3. The Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) came into force partly on 28.03.1978 and was deemed to have come into force partly on 03.08.1976. One Smt. Nagarathinam Ammal wife of Sambanda Mudaliar, residing at No. 29, Appu Mudali Street, Mylapore, Chennai, who owned two parcels of land, one measuring 2428 sq. mts. in Survey No. 279/2 and another measuring 7810 sq. mts. in Survey No. 279/5 in Kottivakkam Village, filed a return under Section 6(1) of the Act on 20.09.1976. Thereafter, she applied for exemption under Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top