SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1076

B.V.NAGARATHNA
Rachna – Appellant
Versus
Ashok – Respondent


ORDER :

1. This petition has filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of HMA No. 67 of 2019 titled as “Ashok vs. Rachna Devi” under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the Court of Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ambah, M.P. to the Learned Family Court, Saket, New Delhi.

2. Respondent was served on 10th June, 2020.

3. By Order dated 08th November, 2021, Office was directed to ascertain whether the vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the Respondent and if so, to put up in the next date of hearing. It is noted that there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

4. In the said circumstances, I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid case has been filed by the respondent in Ambah in the Court of Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ambah, M.P., while the petitioner is residing in Delhi which is a distance of about 800 Km. That it is not possible for the petitioner to travel all the way to Ambah District of M.P., for the purpose of defending the aforesaid case. In such circumsta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top