1. Challenge to Trial Court order taking cognizance of offence — High Court rejection — Special Leave Petition — Review Petition. (Para 1 )
Back
Next 
2021 Supreme(SC) 1040
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Bela M. Trivedi, JJ.
B.G. Uday - Petitioner
Versus
H. G. Prashanth - Respondent
Review Petition (Criminal) No.410 of 2021 In Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.1482 of 2021
Decided On : 30-11-2021
Important Points
Courts generally defer to the decisions of lower courts unless there is a clear error on the record.
Subject
Criminal Law - Appeals and Review
Headnote
Cognizance - Challenge to High Court Order - Dismissal of Special Leave Petition
Fact of the Case:
The Trial Court's order taking cognizance of the offence was challenged before the High Court, which rejected the challenge. The Special Leave Petition against the High Court's order was dismissed.
Finding of the Court:
After reviewing the material on record, no grounds for interference were found, and the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. The Review Petition was also dismissed for lack of any apparent error on record.
Issues: Challenge to Trial Court's order, High Court's rejection of the challenge, Dismissal of Special Leave Petition, Review Petition
Ratio Decidendi: The court found no basis for interference with the orders of the lower courts, indicating a deferential approach to their decisions.
Final Decision: The Special Leave Petition and Review Petition were both dismissed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Validity of the order taking cognizance of the offence. (Para 1 )
3. No case for interference found in the Special Leave Petition; no error apparent on record to justify interference in the Review Petition. (Para 2 , 3 )
4. A review petition is maintainable only upon the existence of an error apparent on the record. (Para 3 )
5. Review Petition dismissed. (Para 4 )
6. What is the legal standard for granting interference in a Review Petition?
Interference in a Review Petition is justified only when there is an error apparent on the record. (Para 3 )
7. On what basis is a Special Leave Petition dismissed by the court?
A Special Leave Petition is dismissed when, after considering the material on record, the court finds no case for interference. (Para 2 )
ORDER :
1. The order dated 22nd October 2020 passed by the Trial Court taking cognizance of the offence was subject-matter of challenge before the High Court. The High Court rejected the challenge which order was under appeal in the aforestated Special Leave Petition.
2. After considering the material on record, no case for interference was found to have been made out and the Special Leave Petition was dismissed.
3. We have gone through the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference.
4. This Review Petition is dismissed.
