1. Review Petition — Rejection of Special Leave Petition at the admission stage. (Para 3 , 4 )
Back
Next 
2021 Supreme(SC) 1038
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, JJ.
N. Tahera & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
Seema Begum & Anr. – Respondents
Review Petition (Civil) No. …….. @ Diary No.25555 of 2021 In Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6866 of 2021
Decided On : 30-11-2021
Important Points
The court dismissed the review petition after finding no error apparent on record.
Subject
Civil Law - Review Petition
Headnote
Delay - Review Petition - The court condoned the delay in preferring the review petition but rejected the application for listing the review petition in open court. The court found no substance in the special leave petition and dismissed the review petition after finding no error apparent on record.
Fact of the Case:
The court condoned the delay in preferring the review petition and rejected the application for listing the review petition in open court. The court found no substance in the special leave petition and dismissed the review petition after finding no error apparent on record.
Finding of the Court:
The court did not find any substance in the special leave petition and dismissed the review petition after finding no error apparent on record.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi:
Final Decision: The review petition is dismissed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. The Special Leave Petition lacked substance, and the Review Petition showed no error apparent on record to justify interference. (Para 3 , 4 )
3. Interference in a review petition is justified only when there is an error apparent on the record. (Para 4 )
4. Delay condoned — Application for open court listing rejected — Review Petition dismissed. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 )
5. What is the legal standard for granting interference in a review petition?
Interference in a review petition is justified only if the court finds an error apparent on the record. (Para 4 )
6. Can a court condone the delay in filing a review petition?
Yes, the court has the authority to condone the delay in preferring a review petition. (Para 1 )
7. What is the outcome when a Special Leave Petition is found to lack substance at the admission stage?
A Special Leave Petition that is found to have no substance may be rejected at the admission stage. (Para 3 )
ORDER :
1. Delay in preferring the Review Petition is condoned.
2. Application for listing Review Petition in open Court is rejected.
3. Considering the material on record, this Court did not find any substance in the Special Leave Petition which was rejected at the admission stage.
4. We have gone through the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference.
5. This review Petition is dismissed.
