SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1026

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. SHAH, A.S. BOPANNA, JJ.
Keraleeya Samajam & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Pratibha Dattatray Kulkarni (Dead) through LRs & Ors. - Respondents
Special Leave Petition (C) No.21660-21661 of 2019
Decided on : 01-10-2021

Headnote:

Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 – Special leave petitions – Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with impugned judgment and order in Writ Petition and Writ Petition passed by High Court of Judicature at Bombay, management has preferred present special leave petitions – By impugned common judgment and order High Court has declared that entitlement of original petitioners is to receive wages in pay scales as per Schedule-C to Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 – Thereafter, Division Bench has disposed of said writ petitions issuing a direction to Deputy Director (Education) to see that teachers working with petitioners school are received their wages and salaries accordingly – High Court has also not accepted submissions on behalf of petitioner to restrict arrears to preceding filing of writ petition – Held, Respondents were compelled to approach Deputy Director only when petitioners though were required to pay wages as per applicable rules and as per recommendation of Commission, failed to make payment, respondents were compelled to approach Deputy Director (Education) thereafter – Therefore for lapse and inaction on part of petitioners, respondents cannot be made to suffer and deny arrears of salaries as per Commission recommendation, which otherwise they are entitled to – Every time teachers were not supposed to approach appropriate authority for getting benefit as and when there is a revision of pay as per the pay commission recommendations – Petitions dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 28.06.2019 in Writ Petition No.5311 of 2011 and Writ Petition No.5338 of 2000 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, the management has preferred the present special leave petitions. By the impugned common judgment and order the High Court has declared that the entitlement of the original petitioners is to receive wages in pay scales as per Schedule-C to the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981. Thereafter, the Division Bench has disposed of the said writ petitions issuing a direction to the Deputy Director (Education) to see that the teachers working with the petitioners school are received their wages and salaries accordingly. The High Court has also not accepted the submissions on behalf of the petitioner to restrict arrears to three years preceding the filing of the writ petition.

2. At the outset, it is required to be noted that in the order dated 21.10.2019, this court recorded the submissions on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are ready to pay the arrears as per 6th Pay Commission for the preceding three years prior to the filing of the writ petition. Thereafter this court passed the following order on 04.11.2019:

    “Being aggrieved by the impugned order of the High Court directing the petitioners-Institution to pay the arrears of salary as per the Fifth and Sixth Pay Commissions to the teaching and non-teaching staff of the second petitioner-School (said to be unaided school) the petitioners have filed these special leave petitions.

    We have heard Mr. Shekhar Napahade, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. Bina Madhavan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners who has submitted that the petitioners are ready to pay arrears as per the Sixth Pay Commission for the preceding three years prior to the filing of the writ petition.

    On the above submission, the petitioner to file the calculation memo as arrears of the amount payable to the teaching and non-teaching staff.

    Accordingly, the petitioners have filed calculation memo as per which the amount towards the salary for three years preceding the filing of writ petition (Sixth Pay Commission), Rs.1,49,13,459/- is payable.

    So far as the total arrears towards Fifth Pay Commission an amount of Rs.1,19,96,967/-is payable. Insofar as the Sixth Pay Commission an amount of Rs.5,34,50,719/-is stated to be the arrears payable. Thus the total arrear as per Fifth and Six Pay Commissions is Rs.6,54,47,686/-(Rs.1,19,96,967/-+ Rs.5,34,50,719/-) and out of the said amount 50% works out to Rs.3,27,23,843/-.

    Mr. Shekhar Napahde, learned senior counsel, has submitted that the second petitioner being unaided school may not be in a position to deposit the entire amount. Considering the submission made at the Bar, there shall be an interim stay of the operation of the impugned order on condition that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the total amount which works out to Rs.3,27,23,843/-within a period of eight weeks failing which the interim stay granted by this Court shall be automatically vacated. The deposit of the above amount shall be without prejudice to the contention of the petitioners in the matter.

    On such deposit, the amount of Rs.3,27,23,843/-shall be disbursed to the teaching and non-teaching staff of the second petitioner-school and other employees who are held entitled to get arrears as per the orders of the High Court.

    Issue notice.”

    That thereafter a further order dated 29.01.2020 came to be passed by this court, which reads as under:

    “In compliance of Order dated 04.11.2019 the petitioners Institution has deposited the amount of Rs.3,27,23,843/-(Rupees three crore twenty seven lakhs twenty three thousand eight hundred forty three) in the Registry of the Supreme Court. As per the said order the amount is to be disbursed to the teaching & non-teaching staff and the other employees of the second petitioner-M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top