SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1087

B.V.NAGARATHNA
Mamta – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Chand Agrawal – Respondent


ORDER :

1. This petition has filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure ,1908 by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of Divorce Case No. 94 of 2018 titled as “Shri Kailash Chand Agrawal Vs. Smt. Mamta” under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, No. 1, Aburoad, Sirohi, Rajasthan to the Court of the 28-4th Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Ghandinagar, Gujarat.

2. By Order dated 18th October, 2019, notice was issued to the respondent and the same has been served on the respondent as per postal tracking report on 19.11.2019. But there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

3. In the aforesaid circumstances, I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid case has been filed by the respondent in Sirohi in the Court of Additional District Judge, No. 1, Aburoad, Sirohi, Rajasthan, while the petitioner is residing in Gandhinagar Gujarat which is a distance of about 237 Km. That it is not possible for the petitioner to travel all the way to Sirohi district of Rajasthan for the purpose of defending the aforesaid case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top