D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, A.S.BOPANNA
VVF (India) Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal arises from a judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 8 November 2019.1[WP No. 8834 of 2018]
3. The issue, which arises in the appeal, is whether amounts which have been deposited under protest prior to an order of assessment can be adjusted against the mandatory pre-deposit required for filing an appeal under Section 26(6A) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 20022[“MVAT Act”].
4. The appellant is a public limited company which engages in the manufacture and sale of oleo-chemicals and personal care products. Between 15 November 2016 and 22 November 2016, an investigation was carried out by the officers of the Sales Tax Department at the premises of the appellant. A notice to show cause was issued on 22 November 2016, to which the appellant filed a reply contesting the proposed tax liabilities. On 8 December 2016 and 11 January 2017, the appellant made a protest payment of Rs 3,64,24,388, comprising an amount of Rs 2,32,37,249 towards tax and Rs 1,31,87,139 towards interest for Assessment Year3[“AY”] 2013-14. On 30 October 2017, a notice to show cause was issued to the appellant in rel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.